Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Contemporary History
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pietikainen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Volk and its Unconscious: Jung, Hauer and the ‘German Revolution’

Petteri Pietikainen

MIT

This article examines the relationship between the Swiss psychiatrist and psychotherapist C.G. Jung and the German Indologist and völkisch scholar J.W. Hauer, with whom Jung collaborated in the early 1930s. In the latter part of the decade, Jung became increasingly wary of the political implications of völkisch doctrines and Hauer's völkisch ambitions, which reached their apotheosis in the founding of the German Faith Movement. There are two main reasons for Jung's increasing reluctance to co-operate with Hauer. First, as his public image was that of a neutral Swiss, Jung did not want to associate too closely with an openly National-Socialist scholar, whose racial ideas he no longer shared and whose influence in Germany was negligible anyway. Second, Jung had become more widely known in the Anglo-American world during the 1930s, and he did not want to risk his growing reputation there by adhering too closely to openly völkisch doctrines. Yet, although the more explicit elements of völkisch ideology disappeared from his writings, in his infatuation with mythical archetypes, he retained some of the more invisible völkisch elements in his psychology.

Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 35, No. 4, 523-539 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/002200940003500401


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?