Journal of Contemporary History

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Love, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 42, No. 3, 447-468 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0022009407078334

`What's the Big Idea?': Oswald Mosley, the British Union of Fascists and Generic Fascism

Gary Love

Faculty of History at the University of Cambridge

This article examines the value of Roger Griffin’s concept of ‘palingenetic populist ultra-nationalism’ as a means of defining fascism as an international movement and ideology. Through an analysis of the development of both native and derivative influences on Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists (BUF), it argues that Griffin’s ‘essentialist’ definition of generic fascism allows scholars to identify distinct common linkages between all interwar fascist movements, including German nazism. Simultaneously, it warns against the danger of relying too heavily on generic definitions to describe individual fascist movements. Operating in the shadow of the Italian and German regimes, the BUF struggled to convince a suspicious British public of the basic vernacular character of its own ideology. While imitating successful fascisms abroad was never an option for the Italians, Mosley could not resist the temptation of foreign ideas, symbols and resources. Such contradictions were further exposed on the eve of war in 1939. In addition, Mosley believed that the West’s rapid descent into permanent decadence could only be arrested by a ‘fascistized’ Europe based on a ‘Four Power Bloc’ of fascist nations — Britain, France, Germany and Italy — a vision not shared by all fascists. Recognition of a fascist willingness to co-operate against Bolshevism and the old ‘plutocracies’ does, however, seem to justify the characterization of fascism as an international movement. This vindicates the heuristic value of Griffin’s definition of fascism, despite the fundamental unviability of a fascist ‘International’.

Key Words: BUF • Fascism • Great Britain • International • Mosley • Nazism


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?